Critical Book Review Examples at Mr. Sedivy's Site | | | |

I have included abook review for illustration purposes. In my first attempt to do a criticalbook review I examined a number of critical book reviews in history in searchofthe common elements. Examining thework of others can provide invaluable information. I would recommend that youread a number of book reviews if you are uncomfortable about writing. I thinkthe following book review is a good example of a critical book review inhistory. The entire review is less than two pages, approximately 650 words,that also fits the criteria for most upper level assignments.


How to Write a Critical Book Review

Guidelines for Writing a Critical Book Review

On being requiredto write my first critical book review for an upper level history course I wasfilled with questions as were many of my peers. I was aware that the discourseis different between disciplines and that each discipline has its own uniquerequirements. I also suspected that there was a difference in the objectivesbetween English and History critical book reviews. My suspicions were confirmedas soon as I read some critical history book reviews. The objectives in bookreviews between the disciplines are different animals. The most difficult partof any assignment is understanding what needs to be done, and how.

Writing Critical Book Reviews - Boise State University

Like many of mypeers, I was a third-year student in a fourth-year class expected to write atthe fourth-year level. The transition to upper level writing across thedisciplines can be traumatic for the unprepared. Many of us had never written acritical book review for history, and not all of us were history majors. Anumber of students dropped out of the course after writing their first criticalbook review in history simply because they did not know what was required anddid not conduct the research to find out. The critical book review in historyis unique to the discipline and a skill that is expected to be mastered byhistory students after their first year. Understanding whata critical book review in history issupposed to consist of is the first step in writing one.

Whatis a critical book review?
A critical book review invites a writer to offer his or her assessment of and insight into a text

Critical Book Review - Gavilan College

The purpose of thecritical book review for history is to share information about an historicaltopic - it is not a book report that summarizes the content. Historiography isthe history of writing on a particular topic. The historical source underreview is usually secondary, that is, it is about an event in history that theauthor has contributed some new information. The review is critical in that itdiscusses and evaluates the significance of this new information. Book reviewsalso provide the historian with a thumbnail sketch of the contents - that maybe very useful in research work. Writing a book review requires that you assessthe books strengths and weaknesses as they pertain to historiography - it isnot a literary review. You should also tell the reader why you liked ordisliked the book.

Writing Critical Book Reviews - Queen's University

Critical Book Review Example and Tutorial | Daily Mayo

A critical book review is a thoughtful discussion of a text's contents, strengths, and limitations. A book review should reflect your capacity to read critically and to evaluate an author's arguments and evidence. Compose your review as you would any essay, with an argument supported by evidence, and a clear, logical structure.

iRubric: Critical Book Review rubric - P4B95B: RCampus

The Pedagogy of the Oppressed
A Critical Book Review

This paper is a report containing a summery and my own opinion of the novel “Pedagogy

of the Oppressed” by Paulo Freire. It is a well-written manifesto for the liberation of oppressed

people everywhere. It speaks of love, unity, and knowledge as vital to creating a world of

freedom; an end to the dialectical struggle of oppression and liberation. Freire has had a beautiful

vision and has shared it with the world in the hopes that it will inspire, and cause others to stand

up for their right to become more human.

Throughout the book, one main point is expressed repeatedly-that the process of

liberation is a mutual one, and that it must be achieved through praxis. True liberation, where the

cycle of oppression and liberation is broken, leaving only a liberated society, can only be arrived

at through the equal use of action and understanding. The people must understand the reasons,

and the necessity of their revolution, as well as acting to liberate themselves, otherwise their

action will be no more than pointless activism. According to Paulo Freire, there is one major

driving force behind the movement for liberation from oppression-that is the desire of all people

to find their humanity. If a person is oppressed, then he or she is prevented from being seen as a

complete human being by the upper class, who sees the oppressed as mere objects. Members of

the oppressive class consider themselves, and only themselves, as human. Only through an act of

love, by rising up in revolt with the goal of freeing the oppressed and the oppressors alike, can

the people ever become more human.

In the second chapter Freire describes the educational system’s role in dominating the

oppressed, as well as providing an alternate method of education that will teach the people to

think, in effect empowering them. He begi...