Court Statistics Project - Criminal Caseloads

The Division of Court Services oversees numerous projects to improve the court system and manages all grants awarded to West Virginia courts. The Division operates the Domestic Violence Registry, the Warrants Database, the Child Abuse and Neglect Database, the West Virginia Court Statistics Database, the Criminal Disposition Database, and the West Virginia Offender Case Management System. The Division of Court Services also administers Court Security Funding and the Court Security Judge system, the Judicial Fatality Review Process, and Family Court facility leases. The Division provides training, technical assistance, statistical analysis, and program evaluation for many court initiatives including the Court Improvement Program, Kanawha County Domestic Violence Court Pilot Project, Drug Courts, Division of Probation Services programs, Criminal Records Disposition, the West Virginia Court Statistics Project, and other systemic improvement initiatives.

Court statistics project free essays about gay marriage

The Court Statistics Project (CSP) - Judiciary of Pennsylvania

Weblink: The Court Statistics Project (NCSC 2015) | SRLN

The purpose of Examining the Work of State Courts is to provide a concise, graphically oriented volume that makes state court statistics highly accessible. Examining the Work of State Courts has been designed to be interactive, giving the reader on-line access in its interactive PDF version to information that cannot reasonably be included in the text of the document. The links provided in this format encourage the use of the Web and provide the reader with additional resources that help to facilitate the understanding of the work of state courts. State Court Caseload Statistics is a discrete reference volume, containing structure charts, statewide aggregate caseload data and reporting practices, population trends, and a detailed explanation of the Court Statistics Project methodology. State Court Caseload Statistics is exclusively available in electronic format on the Web at . The nature of that data also allows taking full advantage of Web publishing to make it more accessible to those who want to obtain and utilize the data, rather than view tables on a printed page. The Caseload Highlights series continues to provide short, periodic reports on specific and significant issues. The Court Statistics Project recognizes that informed judges and court managers want information on a range of policy-relevant topics, and want it in a timely fashion and in a condensed, readable format.

In Support of the Court Statistics Project

And as part of the Court Statistics Project , the stats also show, “Most incoming medical malpractice caseloads are down over the last 10 years.” Of course, injuries and deaths are at , so that can't be good. One day, I hope someone examines how many legitimate cases are not being brought as a result of damages “caps” and other limits on patients legal rights.

Examining the Work of State Courts, 2004: A National Perspective from the Court Statistics Project
The National Center for State Courts Court Statistics Project provides statistical reporting of state court results.

ministrators through its Court Statistics Project Advisory

Unfortunately, recent data has demonstrated that there are very high rates of medical malpractice in the state of New York. As part of its Court Statistics Project, the National Center for State Courts released a report in April of 2011 about malpractice litigation.

court statistics project Welcome to the Idaho Court Assistance Office & Self-Help Center

Court Statistics Project Publications

The CSP has evolved since 1975 by providing more consistent definitions of key terms and parameters for counting. The State Court Model Statistical Dictionary (updated version published in 1989) provided the first set of common terminology, definitions, and usage for reporting appellate and trial court caseloads. Terms for reporting data on case disposition methods were provided in the Dictionary and in other project publications. The classification scheme and associated definitions served as a model framework for developing comparable and useful data. Once a set of recommended terms was adopted, the project’s focus shifted to assessing the comparability of caseload data reported by the courts to those terms. It became particularly important to detail the subject matter jurisdiction and methods of counting cases in each state court. Problems related to categorizing and counting cases in the trial and appellate courts were resolved through the development of the 1984 State Trial Court Jurisdiction Guide for Statistical Reporting and the 1984 State Appellate Court Jurisdiction Guide for Statistical Reporting. The State Court Guide to Statistical Reporting (Guide), originally published in 2004, represents the Court Statistics Project's new data reporting format. Building upon the State Court Model Statistical Dictionary, the Guide includes expanded case type classification matrices, definitions for case types that were not included in the original Dictionary, and more detailed manner of disposition categories. The Guide serves as the model reporting framework for developing comparable and useful data.

Implementing the model annual report : National Court Statistics Project

Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) - Court Statistics Project (CSP)

Information for the national caseload databases comes from published and unpublished sources supplied by state court administrators and appellate court clerks. Published data typically come from official state court annual reports, which vary widely in form and detail. Although constituting the most reliable and valid data available at the state level, they arrive from statistical data filed monthly, quarterly, or annually by numerous local jurisdictions and, in most states, several trial and appellate court systems. Some states either do not publish an annual report or publish only limited caseload statistics for either trial or appellate courts. The Court Statistics Project receives unpublished data from those states in a wide range of forms, including internal management memos, computer-generated output, and the project’s statistical and jurisdictional profiles, which are updated by state court administrative office staff. Extensive telephone contact and follow-up correspondence are used to collect missing data, confirm the accuracy of available data, and determine the legal jurisdiction of each court. Information is also collected concerning the number of judges per court or court system (from annual reports, offices of state court administrators, and appellate court clerks); the state population (based on Bureau of the Census revised estimates); and special characteristics regarding subject matter jurisdiction and court structure. Appendix 2 lists the source of each state’s 2006 caseload statistics.